A systematic review cannot be conducted by one person. You need a team that includes:. An information specialist trained in systematic review searches plays a crucial role in carrying out a comprehensive and unbiased search for the evidence. Health Sciences Library Toggle navigation. Michael's Hospital. Search this Guide Search. Systematic Review Guide. The Systematic Review Process Systematic reviews are considered the highest levels of evidence, but only if they are done rigorously.
Steps Involved in a Systematic Review 1. How Long Does it Take? The Systematic Review Team A systematic review cannot be conducted by one person. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results. Steps to the Systematic Review Process Define your research question. Be as specific as possible, using operational definitions when appropriate.
Based on your question, determine whether a systematic review is the best methodology for your review. See Grant's overview of 14 review types and methodologies. Also consider your available time and capacity. Will your team be able to systematically screen thousands of citations? Identify prior systematic reviews related to your topic. A librarian can help with this. Identifying prior systematic reviews can help you define the scope of your research question and determine how your review whether your review will add to the literature or merely replicate past work.
Assemble your team. Generally, you will want at least two people to screen citations in order to reduce bias, someone with expertise in data synthesis qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods, depending on your plan , and an expert searcher like a Treadwell librarian. Determine study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Develop a plan of organization for your data. How will you keep track of the citations that you find? Formulate your research protocol. The process of registration is straightforward and their guidance notes will tell you exactly what information to include.
Conduct a thorough literature search. Carelessness in abstracting and summarizing appropriate studies, failure to consider important covariates, bias on the part of the meta-analyst and overstatements of the strength and precision of the results can all contribute to invalid meta-analyses.
It is a systematic review that uses quantitative methods to synthesize and summarize the results. An advantage of a meta-analysis is the ability to be completely objective in evaluating research findings.
Not all topics, however, have sufficient research evidence to allow a meta-analysis to be conducted. Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel. Skip to content Home Articles How many studies should be included in a systematic review?
Ben Davis June 2, How many studies should be included in a systematic review? What is a good systematic review? How do you know if a systematic review is good?
What are the limitations of a systematic review? Why systematic review is best? How reliable are systematic reviews? What type of research is systematic review? What is a literature review vs systematic review? What are the aims of a systematic review? What is a key feature of a systematic review? What is the systematic method? How do you write an introduction for a systematic review?
Can you include systematic reviews in a literature review? What are the steps of a systematic review?
0コメント